How can there be any doubt? Rahm got rid of Netanyahu before, for Clinton.

U.S. acts as though it seeks regime change in Israel
The Obama administration's lack of a clear strategy to move Mideast peace talks forward raises the question of whether the U.S. is interested in bringing about a new, more pliable Israeli government.By Aaron David Miller
Regime change. Generally it's a term and tactic reserved for America's enemies. But what if the Obama administration is developing a more nuanced version for one of the United States' closest allies -- Israel?
As the brouhaha between Israel and the United States over settlements and Jerusalem continues to simmer, you have to wonder whether President Obama is focused on changing the behavior of Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, or changing prime ministers instead. The absence of a clear strategy to move the Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations forward, highlighted by the administration's repeated calls for a settlements freeze -- which neither Netanyahu nor his Likud-led right-wing coalition can accept -- raises the question of whether Washington is interested in bringing about a new and more pliable Israeli government.//
***Of course Obama wants a more pliable Israeli government so he can sell Israel down the river by forcing them to suicidal concessions. He likes Tsipi Livni for this purpose but Israel may unite in the face of this obvious ploy from someone whose knowledge of history is flawed. Obama thinks the Holocaust showed that Jews will go meekly to their deaths. Appeasers often create greater havoc than they can anticipate.***